Wage Inequality of Mexican Immigrants by Type of Job Qualification in the United States

0Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The objective of this research is to analyze the characteristics of the labor market insertion of Mexicans by type of qualification and their wage differences in relation to native workers in the United States. The hypothesis is that there is a wage inequality between Mexican migrant workers and native workers, accentuated among skilled workers, due to a segmentation of the U.S. labor market. The methodology used to analyze each of the components that add up to the wage gap between Mexican and native workers is the Ñopo decomposition. The results showed the opposite of what is established by the human capital theory since the wage difference between Mexicans inmigrants and natives by type of job qualification is mostly unexplainable from a statistical point of view and escapes modeling. This means that having citizenship and education does not eliminate the differences between Mexicans and natives. This allows us to accept the hypothesis, except in the case of low-skilled Mexican immigrants, since they have a wage differential in their favor.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pérez, R. E. R., & Martínez, D. V. (2022). Wage Inequality of Mexican Immigrants by Type of Job Qualification in the United States. Lecturas de Economia, (97), 217–254. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.le.n97a345715

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free