Clinical Predictors of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Emergency Versus Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

  • Abe D
  • Sato A
  • Hoshi T
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND To evaluate the incidence and clinical predictors of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), unstable angina pectoris/non-STEMI (UAP/NSTEMI), and stable AP (SAP) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS We enrolled 1,954 patients (SAP, n=1,222; UAP/NSTEMI, n=277; STEMI, n=455) who underwent PCI. Patients were categorized according to contrast media volume/estimated glomerular filtration rate ratio (CV/eGFR low: <2.0, mid: 2.0-2.9, high: ≥3.0). CI-AKI was defined as an increase in serum creatinine of 0.5mg/dl or 25% within 1 week from contrast-medium injection. The incidence of CI-AKI was highest among the STEMI patients (SAP, 4.24%; UAP/NSTEMI, 10.7%; STEMI, 16.1%, P<0.01). Significant predictors of CI-AKI were emergency PCI (odds ratio [OR] 3.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.55-5.37; P<0.001), ejection fraction <40% (OR 2.04; 95% CI 1.24-3.36; P=0.005), and hemoglobin <10g/dl (OR 0.02; 95% CI 1.17-4.55; P=0.02) after multivariate logistic regression analysis. In the SAP group, a CV/eGFR ratio ≥3.0 was a significant predictor of CI-AKI (P=0.048), but not in UAP/NSTEMI and STEMI patients. CONCLUSIONS UAP/NSTEMI and STEMI patients undergoing emergency PCI were at high risk for CI-AKI regardless of CV/eGFR ratio. Minimizing the dose of contrast medium based on eGFR might be valuable in reducing the risk of CI-AKI in SAP patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abe, D., Sato, A., Hoshi, T., Kakefuda, Y., Watabe, H., Ojima, E., … Aonuma, K. (2014). Clinical Predictors of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Emergency Versus Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circulation Journal, 78(1), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.cj-13-0574

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free