Anything You Say May Be Used Against You in a Court of Law: Abstract Agent Argumentation (Triple-A)

4Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Triple-A is an abstract argumentation model, distinguishing the global argumentation of judges from the local argumentation of accused, prosecutors, witnesses, lawyers, and experts. In Triple-A, agents have partial knowledge of the arguments and attacks of other agents, and they decide autonomously whether to accept or reject their own arguments, and whether to bring their arguments forward in court. The arguments accepted by the judge are based on a game-theoretic equilibrium among the argumentation of the other agents. The Triple-A theory can be used to distinguish various direct and indirect ways in which the arguments of an agent can be used against his or her other arguments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arisaka, R., Satoh, K., & van der Torre, L. (2018). Anything You Say May Be Used Against You in a Court of Law: Abstract Agent Argumentation (Triple-A). Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10791, 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00178-0_29

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free