A meta-strategy for coordinating of one-to-many negotiation over multiple issues

23Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper presents a novel approach for managing multi-bilateral concurrent negotiations. We extend our previous work by considering a situation where a buyer agent negotiates with multiple seller agents concurrently over multiple continuous issues instead of a single issue. A related work in this area considers a meta-strategy for bilateral negotiations. This work adapts the previous related work to coordinate multi-bilateral concurrent negotiations taking into consideration the different behaviors of the opponents during negotiation to decide on choosing the appropriate negotiation strategy (i.e., trade-off or concession) for the buyer agent's delegates at each negotiation round. A negotiation meta-strategy to coordinate the one-to-many negotiation form is proposed and empirically tested under various negotiation environments. The experiments show the robustness of our coordination mechanism. © 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mansour, K., & Kowalczyk, R. (2011). A meta-strategy for coordinating of one-to-many negotiation over multiple issues. In Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing (Vol. 122, pp. 343–353). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25664-6_40

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free