A simple test for random effects in regression models

93Citations
Citations of this article
125Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Testing that random effects are zero is difficult, because the null hypothesis restricts the corresponding variance parameter to the edge of the feasible parameter space. In the context of generalized linear mixed models, this paper exploits the link between random effects and penalized regression to develop a simple test for a zero effect. The idea is to treat the variance components not being tested as fixed at their estimates and then to express the likelihood ratio as a readily computed quadratic form in the predicted values of the random effects. Under the null hypothesis this has the distribution of a weighted sum of squares of independent standard normal random variables. The test can be used with generalized linear mixed models, including those estimated by penalized quasilikelihood. © 2013 Biometrika Trust..

References Powered by Scopus

Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R

6563Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models

5197Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Likelihood ratio tests in linear mixed models with one variance component

330Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Generalized additive models: An introduction with R, second edition

5902Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The cave of shadows: Addressing the human factor with generalized additive mixed models

149Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Unravelling the predictive power of telematics data in car insurance pricing

101Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wood, S. N. (2013). A simple test for random effects in regression models. Biometrika, 100(4), 1005–1010. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/ast038

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 43

49%

Researcher 28

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 12

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36

50%

Mathematics 15

21%

Environmental Science 14

19%

Medicine and Dentistry 7

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free