Informed decision making about prostate cancer testing in predominantly immigrant black men: A randomized controlled trial

49Citations
Citations of this article
124Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Decision support interventions have been developed to help men clarify their values and make informed decisions about prostate cancer testing, but they seldom target high-risk black and immigrant men. Purpose: This study evaluated the efficacy of a decision support intervention focused on prostate cancer testing in a sample of predominantly immigrant black men. Methods: Black men (N = 490) were randomized to tailored telephone education about prostate cancer testing or a control condition. Results: Post-intervention, the intervention group had significantly greater knowledge, lower decision conflict, and greater likelihood of talking with their physician about prostate cancer testing than the control group. There were no significant intervention effects on prostate specific antigen testing, congruence between testing intention and behavior, or anxiety. Conclusions: A tailored telephone decision support intervention can promote informed decision making about prostate cancer testing in black and predominantly immigrant men without increasing testing or anxiety. © The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2012.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lepore, S. J., Wolf, R. L., Basch, C. E., Godfrey, M., McGinty, E., Shmukler, C., … Weinrich, S. (2012). Informed decision making about prostate cancer testing in predominantly immigrant black men: A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 44(3), 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9392-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free