Effect of a rapid response system on code rates and in-hospital mortality in medical wards

9Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: To determine the effects of implementing a rapid response system (RRS) on code rates and in-hospital mortality in medical wards. Methods: This retrospective study included adult patients admitted to medical wards at Seoul National University Hospital between July 12, 2016 and March 12, 2018; the sample comprised 4,224 patients admitted 10 months before RRS implementation and 4,168 patients admitted 10 months following RRS implementation. Our RRS only worked during the daytime (7 AM to 7 PM) on weekdays. We compared code rates and in-hospital mortality rates between the preintervention and postintervention groups. Results: There were 62.3 RRS activations per 1,000 admissions. The most common reasons for RRS activation were tachypnea or hypopnea (44%), hypoxia (31%), and tachycardia or bradycardia (21%). Code rates from medical wards during RRS operating times significantly decreased from 3.55 to 0.96 per 1,000 admissions (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10 to 0.87; P=0.028) after RRS implementation. However, code rates from medical wards during RRS nonoperating times did not differ between the preintervention and postintervention groups (2.60 vs. 3.12 per 1,000 admissions; aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.55 to 2.76; P=0.614). In-hospital mortality significantly decreased from 56.3 to 42.7 per 1,000 admissions after RRS implementation (aOR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.97; P=0.024). Conclusions: Implementation of an RRS was associated with significant reductions in code rates during RRS operating times and in-hospital mortality in medical wards.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, H. Y., Lee, J., Lee, S. M., Kim, S., Yang, E., Joo Lee, H., … Cho, J. (2019). Effect of a rapid response system on code rates and in-hospital mortality in medical wards. Acute and Critical Care, 34(4), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2019.00668

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free