A complete characterization of all-versus-nothing arguments for stabilizer states

6Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

An important class of contextuality arguments in quantum foundations are the all-versus-nothing (AvN) proofs, generalizing a construction originally due to Mermin. We present a general formulation of AvN arguments and a complete characterization of all such arguments that arise from stabilizer states. We show that every AvN argument for an n-qubit stabilizer state can be reduced to an AvN proof for a three-qubit state that is local Clifford-equivalent to the tripartite Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger state. This is achieved through a combinatorial characterization of AvN arguments, the AvN triple theorem, whose proof makes use of the theory of graph states. This result enables the development of a computational method to generate all the AvN arguments in Z2 on n-qubit stabilizer states. We also present new insights into the stabilizer formalism and its connections with logic. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Second quantum revolution: foundational questions’.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abramsky, S., Barbosa, R. S., Carù, G., & Perdrix, S. (2017). A complete characterization of all-versus-nothing arguments for stabilizer states. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 375(2106). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0385

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free