A Comparative Assessment of Emerging Solvents and Adsorbents for Mitigating CO2 Emissions From the Industrial Sector by Using Molecular Modeling Tools

24Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The possibilities offered by molecular modeling tools to obtain relevant data at process conditions, while also gaining molecular insights on the techniques used for CO2 capture and separation, are presented here using selected case studies. Two different technologies, absorption with amine-based systems and adsorption on porous materials, were explored, using the molecular-based equation of state, soft-Statistical Associating Fluid Theory (SAFT), and Grand Canonical Monte Carlo simulations, respectively. The aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA) system was set as the benchmark for absorption and compared to the performance of 8 alternative amine-based systems, while 16 adsorbents belonging to different families (zeolites, metal–organic frameworks, amorphous silicas, and activated carbons), bare or functionalized with alkylamines, were investigated for the separation of CO2 by adsorption. In addition to obtaining molecular information on the CO2 capture process, the models were further used to examine the CO2 capture performance in terms of cyclic working capacity and energy index as key performance indicators, allowing the identification of promising systems that can improve the current ones to be further evaluated for separation in non-power industries. Results show that for the same total amine mass concentration, non-aqueous amine solvents have a 5–10% reduction in cyclic working capacity, and a 10–30% decrease in the energy index compared to their aqueous counterparts due to their lower heat of vaporization and specific heat capacity. In addition, M-MOF-74, NaX, and NaY structures present the best results for adsorption in temperature swing adsorption (TSA) processes. Similar values of energy requirements to those of amine-based systems (2–2.5 MJ kg CO2–1) were obtained for some of the adsorbent; however, the disadvantage of the TSA process versus absorption should be considered. These results confirm the reliability of molecular modeling as an attractive and valuable screening tool for CO2 capture and separation processes.

References Powered by Scopus

Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics

38082Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Computer simulation of liquids: Second edition

6697Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The OPLS Potential Functions for Proteins. Energy Minimizations for Crystals of Cyclic Peptides and Crambin

4539Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Activated carbons from biomass-based sources for CO<inf>2</inf> capture applications

200Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Current and future perspectives on catalytic-based integrated carbon capture and utilization

109Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Challenges and opportunities in carbon capture, utilization and storage: A process systems engineering perspective

61Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bahamon, D., Alkhatib, I. I. I., Alkhatib, N., Builes, S., Sinnokrot, M., & Vega, L. F. (2020). A Comparative Assessment of Emerging Solvents and Adsorbents for Mitigating CO2 Emissions From the Industrial Sector by Using Molecular Modeling Tools. Frontiers in Energy Research, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.00165

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

71%

Researcher 4

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

8%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Chemical Engineering 14

52%

Engineering 8

30%

Chemistry 3

11%

Materials Science 2

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free