Clinical Application of the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag Test for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection

26Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We evaluated the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag test for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) compared to the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. We applied both tests to patients who were about to be hospitalized, had visited an emergency room, or had been admitted due to COVID-19 confirmed by RT-PCR. Two nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained; one was tested by RT-PCR and the other by the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag test. A total of 118 pairs of tests from 98 patients were performed between January 5 and 11, 2021. The overall sensitivity and specificity for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) for the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag test compared to RT-PCR were 17.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.8–32.0%) and 100% (95% CI, 95.3–100.0%). Analysis of the results using RT-PCR cycle thresholds of ≤ 30 or ≤ 25 increased the sensitivity to 26.9% (95% CI, 13.7–46.1%), and 41.1% (95% CI, 21.6–64.0%), respectively.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oh, S. M., Jeong, H., Chang, E., Choe, P. G., Kang, C. K., Park, W. B., … Kim, N. J. (2021). Clinical Application of the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag Test for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 36(14), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e101

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free