Babble: Learning Better Abstractions with E-Graphs and Anti-unification

22Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Library learning compresses a given corpus of programs by extracting common structure from the corpus into reusable library functions. Prior work on library learning suffers from two limitations that prevent it from scaling to larger, more complex inputs. First, it explores too many candidate library functions that are not useful for compression. Second, it is not robust to syntactic variation in the input. We propose library learning modulo theory (LLMT), a new library learning algorithm that additionally takes as input an equational theory for a given problem domain. LLMT uses e-graphs and equality saturation to compactly represent the space of programs equivalent modulo the theory, and uses a novel e-graph anti-unification technique to find common patterns in the corpus more directly and efficiently. We implemented LLMT in a tool named babble. Our evaluation shows that babble achieves better compression orders of magnitude faster than the state of the art. We also provide a qualitative evaluation showing that babble learns reusable functions on inputs previously out of reach for library learning.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cao, D., Kunkel, R., Nandi, C., Willsey, M., Tatlock, Z., & Polikarpova, N. (2023). Babble: Learning Better Abstractions with E-Graphs and Anti-unification. Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, 7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3571207

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free