Should mycophenolate mofetil replace cyclophosphamide as first-line therapy for severe lupus nephritis

14Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Available treatments for severe (class III, IV, and V) lupus nephritis (LN) have expanded greatly over the last 40 years. In the 1970s and 1980s, cyclphosphamide (CYC), in combination with glucocorticoids, gained favor as induction and maintenance therapy for severe LN. However, the adverse event profile of CYC led to the search for other medications for severe LN. Beginning in the late 1990s, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was introduced as induction and maintenance therapy for severe LN. This review discusses the clinical trial results, pharmacology, cost-effectiveness, and adverse effect profiles of CYC compared to MMF for induction and maintenance therapy for severe LN. The authors conclude that MMF should be considered first-line induction and maintenance treatment therapy for severe LN, although CYC may have a place under specific clinical and economic circumstances. © 2012 International Society of Nephrology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hogan, J., Schwenk, M. H., & Radhakrishnan, J. (2012, December 2). Should mycophenolate mofetil replace cyclophosphamide as first-line therapy for severe lupus nephritis. Kidney International. Nature Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2012.203

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free