The number of repeated observations needed to estimate the habitual physical activity of an individual to a given level of precision

24Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Physical activity behavior varies naturally from day to day, from week to week and even across seasons. In order to assess the habitual level of physical activity of a person, the person must be monitored for long enough so that the level can be identified, taking into account this natural within-person variation. An important question, and one whose answer has implications for study- and survey design, epidemiological research and population surveillance, is, for how long does an individual need to be monitored before such a habitual level or pattern can be identified to a desired level of precision? The aim of this study was to estimate the number of repeated observations needed to identify the habitual physical activity behaviour of an individual to a given degree of precision. A convenience sample of 50 Swedish adults wore accelerometers during four consecutive weeks. The number of days needed to come within 5–50% of an individual’s usual physical activity 95% of the time was calculated. To get an idea of the uncertainty of the estimates all statistical estimates were bootstrapped 2000 times. The mean number of days of measurement needed for the observation to, with 95% confidence, be within 20% of the habitual physical activity of an individual is highest for vigorous physical activity, for which 182 days are needed. For sedentary behaviour the equivalent number of days is 2.4. To capture 80% of the sample to within ±20% of their habitual level of physical activity, 3.4 days is needed if sedentary behavior is the outcome of interest, and 34.8 days for MVPA. The present study shows that for analyses requiring accurate data at the individual level a longer measurement collection period than the traditional 7-day protocol should be used. In addition, the amount of MVPA was negatively associated with the number of days required to identify the habitual physical activity level indicating that the least active are also those whose habitual physical activity level is the most difficult to identify. These results could have important implications for researchers whose aim is to analyse data on an individual level. Before recommendations regarding an appropriate monitoring protocol are updated, the present study should be replicated in different populations.

Figures

  • Table 1. Descriptive data of the studied population. The 95% CI is based on bootstrapped estimates (k = 2000) and the p-values are from an independent samples t-test.
  • Fig 1. Histograms depicting the bootstrapped (k = 2000) estimates of number of days needed to with 95% confidence be within 20% of the habitual level of physical activity of an individual at different intensities.
  • Table 2. Based on the bootstrapped estimates, the number of days that are required to identify between 50% and 95% of the sample within 5–50% of their habitual level of physical activity is shown. E.g. to capture the sedentary activity of at least 80% of the sample to a level of precision of ±20% of their habitual level of sedentary behavior, 3.4 days of monitoring is needed. Mean refers to the estimated mean level of habitual physical activity based on the within-subject variation.
  • Fig 2. The association between the amount of physical activity at different intensities and the CVw as illustrated by a scatter plot with the regression line and its 95% CI (the shaded area).
  • Fig 3. The theoretical number of days needed to monitor an individual, assuming a within-subject coefficient of variation (CVw) of between 10% and 100% to be within ± 20% of the level of an individual’s habitual physical activity 70–95% of the time.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bergman, P. (2018). The number of repeated observations needed to estimate the habitual physical activity of an individual to a given level of precision. PLoS ONE, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192117

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

81%

Researcher 2

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Sports and Recreations 6

38%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

25%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

19%

Psychology 3

19%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0