Early Hemodynamic Changes following Surgical Ablation of the Right Greater Splanchnic Nerve for the Treatment of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

4Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Permanent ablation of the right greater splanchnic nerve (GSN) has previously been demonstrated to improve quality of life and functional outcomes, as well as reduce abnormally high intracardiac filling pressures, in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) at 1, 3 and 12 months following the procedure. We hypothesize that hemodynamic changes that ensue from surgical right GSN ablation would be apparent as early as 24 h after the medical intervention. Methods and Results: This is a prespecified analysis of a single-arm, two-center, open-label study evaluating the effects of right GSN ablation via thoracoscopic surgery in HFpEF patients with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≥15 mmHg at rest or ≥25 mmHg with supine cycle ergometry. A total of seven patients (median age 67 years, 29% female) underwent GSN removal followed by invasive right heart catheterization within 24 h. GSN ablation resulted in a significant reduction in PCWP 24 h after the procedure compared to baseline for both 20 W exercise (baseline (28.0 ± 4.3 mmHg) to 24 h (19.6 ± 6.9 mmHg); p = 0.0124) and peak exercise (baseline (25.6 ± 2.4 mmHg) to 24 h (17.4 ± 5.9 mmHg); p = 0.0025). There were no significant changes in resting or leg-up hemodynamics. Conclusions: Permanent right GSN ablation leads to a reduction in intracardiac filling pressures during exercise, apparent as early as 24 h following the procedure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gajewski, P., Fudim, M., Kittipibul, V., Engelman, Z. J., Biegus, J., Zymliński, R., & Ponikowski, P. (2022). Early Hemodynamic Changes following Surgical Ablation of the Right Greater Splanchnic Nerve for the Treatment of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11041063

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free