Paying the piper: the governance of vice-chancellors’ remuneration in Australian and UK universities

25Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There is a long-running cyclical public debate in the UK and Australia about the level of vice-chancellors’ remuneration in publicly funded universities. Whilst governments may promise greater oversight, little appears to change. Similar trends are emerging in some other European countries. This article critically considers the determination of vice-chancellors’ remuneration as a governance issue. In the context of corporatised public universities, we consider how reforms in university governance may have contributed to the shifting nature and levels of vice-chancellors’ remuneration in Australia and the UK. We argue that this area requires urgent governance reform.

References Powered by Scopus

Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure

35770Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Toward a stewardship theory of management

3022Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns

1752Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

‘This can’t be the new norm’: academics’ perspectives on the COVID-19 crisis for the Australian university sector

73Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Zombie leadership: Dead ideas that still walk among us

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bourdieu and Higher Education: Life in the Modern University

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boden, R., & Rowlands, J. (2022). Paying the piper: the governance of vice-chancellors’ remuneration in Australian and UK universities. Higher Education Research and Development, 41(2), 254–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1841741

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

59%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

27%

Researcher 3

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 10

43%

Social Sciences 7

30%

Engineering 3

13%

Arts and Humanities 3

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 3
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 99

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0