Peer communication in online mental health forums for young people: Directional and nondirectional support

93Citations
Citations of this article
214Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The Internet has the potential to help young people by reducing the stigma associated with mental health and enabling young people to access services and professionals which they may not otherwise access. Online support can empower young people, help them develop new online friendships, share personal experiences, communicate with others who understand, provide information and emotional support, and most importantly help them feel less alone and normalize their experiences in the world. Objective: The aim of the research was to gain an understanding of how young people use an online forum for emotional and mental health issues. Specifically, the project examined what young people discuss and how they seek support on the forum (objective 1). Furthermore, it looked at how the young service users responded to posts to gain an understanding of how young people provided each other with peer-to-peer support (objective 2). Methods: Kooth is an online counseling service for young people aged 11-25 years and experiencing emotional and mental health problems. It is based in the United Kingdom and provides support that is anonymous, confidential, and free at the point of delivery. Kooth provided the researchers with all the online forum posts between a 2-year period, which resulted in a dataset of 622 initial posts and 3657 initial posts with responses. Thematic analysis was employed to elicit key themes from the dataset. Results: The findings support the literature that online forums provide young people with both informational and emotional support around a wide array of topics. The findings from this large dataset also reveal that this informational or emotional support can be viewed as directive or nondirective. The nondirective approach refers to when young people provide others with support by sharing their own experiences. These posts do not include explicit advice to act in a particular way, but the sharing process is hoped to be of use to the poster. The directive approach, in contrast, involves individuals making an explicit suggestion of what they believe the poster should do. Conclusions: This study adds to the research exploring what young people discuss within online forums and provides insights into how these communications take place. Furthermore, it highlights the challenge that organizations may encounter in mediating support that is multidimensional in nature (informational-emotional, directive-nondirective).

References Powered by Scopus

Using thematic analysis in psychology

110426Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects

4726Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction

2982Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Digital Health Interventions for Delivery of Mental Health Care: Systematic and Comprehensive Meta-Review

127Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Young people's priorities for support on social media: “It takes trust to talk about these issues”

55Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Online peer to peer support: Qualitative analysis of UK and US open mental health Facebook groups

53Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Prescott, J., Hanley, T., & Ujhelyi, K. (2017). Peer communication in online mental health forums for young people: Directional and nondirectional support. JMIR Mental Health, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.6921

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 67

65%

Researcher 17

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 15

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 32

38%

Social Sciences 24

29%

Medicine and Dentistry 15

18%

Nursing and Health Professions 13

15%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0