Background: PRAETORIAN is the first randomized controlled trial that demonstrated the noninferiority of subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) in comparison with transvenous ICD (TV-ICD). We retrospectively reviewed electronic records of patients with ICD implanted over the past 6 years, with the primary objective to compare our real-world single tertiary center experience with the randomized data from the PRAETORIAN study. Methods: Seventy S-ICD patients were compared with 197 TV-ICD patients, from July 2014 to June 2020 retrospectively, over a median period of 1304 days (296–2451 days). Primary composite endpoints included inappropriate shocks and device-related malfunctions. Results: Patients with S-ICD implantation were younger than those who received TV-ICD (mean, 49.7 years vs 63.9 years, p
CITATION STYLE
Khanra, D., Hamid, A., Patel, P., Tomson, J., Abdalla, A., Khan, N., … Petkar, S. (2022). A real-world experience of subcutaneous and transvenous implantable cardiac defibrillators—comparison with the PRAETORIAN study. Journal of Arrhythmia, 38(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12687
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.