A real-world experience of subcutaneous and transvenous implantable cardiac defibrillators—comparison with the PRAETORIAN study

4Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: PRAETORIAN is the first randomized controlled trial that demonstrated the noninferiority of subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) in comparison with transvenous ICD (TV-ICD). We retrospectively reviewed electronic records of patients with ICD implanted over the past 6 years, with the primary objective to compare our real-world single tertiary center experience with the randomized data from the PRAETORIAN study. Methods: Seventy S-ICD patients were compared with 197 TV-ICD patients, from July 2014 to June 2020 retrospectively, over a median period of 1304 days (296–2451 days). Primary composite endpoints included inappropriate shocks and device-related malfunctions. Results: Patients with S-ICD implantation were younger than those who received TV-ICD (mean, 49.7 years vs 63.9 years, p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khanra, D., Hamid, A., Patel, P., Tomson, J., Abdalla, A., Khan, N., … Petkar, S. (2022). A real-world experience of subcutaneous and transvenous implantable cardiac defibrillators—comparison with the PRAETORIAN study. Journal of Arrhythmia, 38(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12687

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free