Effect of vaccine storage temperatures and dose rate on antibody responses to foot and mouth disease vaccination in Cambodia

13Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A field study investigated the effects of foot and mouth disease vaccine storage temperature for 7 days (frozen, refrigerated or held at ambient temperature) and dose (half or full dose) on the serological response to vaccination. It utilised a complete factorial design replicated on 18 smallholder cattle farms in three villages in Pursat province, Cambodia. Antibody responses from the 108 cattle involved were assessed by serological examination of blood samples collected at primary vaccination (day 0), at booster vaccination (day 30) and finally at 60 days post primary vaccination. Vaccination responses to the inactivated vaccine were assessed by testing for antibodies directed against FMD structural proteins in a liquid-phase blocking ELISA (LPBE test) and differentiated from responses to natural infection by examining antibody titres against non-structural viral proteins (NSPE test). LPBE results indicated that the mean log10 LPBE antibody titres of all experimental cattle increased from below protective levels at day 0 to protective levels at 30 days post primary vaccination, and increased further at 60 days post primary vaccination. Storage at ambient temperature for 1 week had no effect on antibody response to vaccination. However, freezing the vaccine for a week or use of a half dose resulted in significant reduction in titres at day 60 (P = 0.04 and P = 0.02, respectively). The results of this study reinforce the need to store FMD vaccines within the range recommended by the manufacturers and to adhere to the specified dosage instructions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sieng, S., Walkden-Brown, S. W., & Kerr, J. (2018). Effect of vaccine storage temperatures and dose rate on antibody responses to foot and mouth disease vaccination in Cambodia. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 4(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.86

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free