Why Do Word Blends with Near-Synonymous Composites Exist and Persist? the Case of Guesstimate, Chillax, Ginormous and Confuzzled

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite their increasing use, little is known about the purpose of word blends, e.g. chillax, which have near-synonymous composite words (relax and chill). Potential explanations for their existence and persistence include: use in different sentence constructions, to provide unique meaning, and to create interest/identity. Th e current study used a vignette methodology with two-hundred and forty-one students to explore the relevance of such hypotheses for 'guesstimate', 'chillax', 'ginormous', and 'confuzzled'. Our inconsistent results suggest that the semantics of the word blends may diff er from their composites in very subtle ways. However further work is needed to acknowledge and determine the impact of context upon the use and consequences of these word blends.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rhys Evans, T., & Steptoe-Warren, G. (2015). Why Do Word Blends with Near-Synonymous Composites Exist and Persist? the Case of Guesstimate, Chillax, Ginormous and Confuzzled. Psychology of Language and Communication, 19(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1515/plc-2015-0002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free