Robustness analysis of metabolic predictions in algal microbial communities based on different annotation pipelines

4Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Animals, plants, and algae rely on symbiotic microorganisms for their development and functioning. Genome sequencing and genomic analyses of these microorganisms provide opportunities to construct metabolic networks and to analyze the metabolism of the symbiotic communities they constitute. Genome-scale metabolic network reconstructions rest on information gained from genome annotation. As there are multiple annotation pipelines available, the question arises to what extent differences in annotation pipelines impact outcomes of these analyses. Here, we compare five commonly used pipelines (Prokka, MaGe, IMG, DFAST, RAST) from predicted annotation features (coding sequences, Enzyme Commission numbers, hypothetical proteins) to the metabolic network-based analysis of symbiotic communities (biochemical reactions, producible compounds, and selection of minimal complementary bacterial communities). While Prokka and IMG produced the most extensive networks, RAST and DFAST networks produced the fewest false positives and the most connected networks with the fewest dead-end metabolites. Our results underline differences between the outputs of the tested pipelines at all examined levels, with small differences in the draft metabolic networks resulting in the selection of different microbial consortia to expand the metabolic capabilities of the algal host. However, the consortia generated yielded similar predicted producible compounds and could therefore be considered functionally interchangeable. This contrast between selected communities and community functions depending on the annotation pipeline needs to be taken into consideration when interpreting the results of metabolic complementarity analyses. In the future, experimental validation of bioinformatic predictions will likely be crucial to both evaluate and refine the pipelines and needs to be coupled with increased efforts to expand and improve annotations in reference databases.

References Powered by Scopus

Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation

11844Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The RAST Server: Rapid annotations using subsystems technology

9555Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Going back to the roots: The microbial ecology of the rhizosphere

2612Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Inferring and comparing metabolism across heterogeneous sets of annotated genomes using AuCoMe

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Community-scale models of microbiomes: Articulating metabolic modelling and metagenome sequencing

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Analysis of the Propionate Metabolism in Bacillus subtilis during 3-Indolacetic Production

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karimi, E., Geslain, E., Belcour, A., Frioux, C., Aïte, M., Siegel, A., … Dittami, S. M. (2021). Robustness analysis of metabolic predictions in algal microbial communities based on different annotation pipelines. PeerJ, 9. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11344

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

56%

Researcher 4

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5

36%

Chemical Engineering 3

21%

Engineering 3

21%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

21%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0