A randomized comparison of intravenous versus lumbar and thoracic epidural fentanyl for analgesia after thoracotomy

180Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Administration of large doses of fentanyl is a popular method to provide postoperative analgesia after thoracotomy. It is however unclear whether epidural lumbar (L) or epidural thoracic (T) administration of fentanyl confers any major advantage over intravenous (iv) infusion. Using a randomized prospective study design, we compared the potential benefits of L, T, and iv fentanyl administration after thoracotomy in 50 patients. Epidural catheters were not injected during surgery. Postoperatively a fentanyl infusion (5 μg/ml) was started at 1 μg · kg-1 · h-1 after a bolus of 1 μg/kg and adjusted to maintain a score ≤ 30/100 at rest using a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Data were prospectively collected before surgery, at fixed intervals during the 48 h of fentanyl infusions, and the day of discharge. There was no difference between the groups in overall quality of analgesia at rest and after coughing, quantity of fentanyl delivered (L = 1.15 ± 0.38, T = 1.22 ± 0.23, iv = 1.27 ± 0.3 μg · kg-1 · h-1), incidence of pruritus needing treatment (L = 2, T = 1, iv = 0 patients), need to decrease fentanyl infusion rate because of side effects (L = 2, T = 2, iv = 4 patients), importance of pulmonary infiltrates, or arterial blood gas values. One patient (L group) needed naloxone (0.04 mg iv). Intravenous patients were more frequently nauseated (P = .009) and needed boluses of fentanyl more often (L = 3 ± 9, iv = 6 ± 12, T = 4 ± 8; P = .04). T fentanyl patients had a shorter hospital stay (L = 14.4 ± 5.6, T = 11.1 ± 2.5, iv = 15.6 ± 5.3 days; P = .02), and a shorter delay for first bowel movement (L = 5.2 ± 2.5, T = 3.6 ± 0.9, iv = 5.6 ± 2.6 days; P = .04). Patients receiving T fentanyl also had better pulmonary function than patients receiving iv fentanyl (FVC: P = .02; FEV1: P = .04). We conclude that, after thoracotomy, T epidural administration of fentanyl confers only marginal benefit over L epidural administration; and that iv fentanyl provides equivalent analgesia to the epidural routes, though with slightly increased incidence of side effects.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guinard, J. P., Mavrocordatos, P., Chiolero, R., & Carpenter, R. L. (1992). A randomized comparison of intravenous versus lumbar and thoracic epidural fentanyl for analgesia after thoracotomy. Anesthesiology, 77(6), 1108–1115. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199212000-00011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free