Prognostic factors for short-term improvement in acute and persistent musculoskeletal pain consulters in primary care

8Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Given the costs associated with the management of musculoskeletal pain in primary care, predicting the course of these conditions remains a research priority. Much of the research into prognostic indicators however considers musculoskeletal conditions in terms of single pain sites whereas in reality, many patients present with pain in more than one site. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors for early improvement in primary care consulters with acute and persistent musculoskeletal conditions across a range of pain sites.Methods: Consecutive patients with a new episode of musculoskeletal pain completed self-report questionnaires at baseline, and then again at the 4/5thtreatment visit, and if they were still consulting, at the 10thvisit. The outcome was defined as patient self-report improvement sufficient to make a meaningful difference. Independent predictors of outcome were identified using multivariate regression analyses.Results: Acute (<7 weeks) patients, on average, had more severe conditions in terms of pain, disability, anxiety and work fear-avoidance behaviour than patients with persistent (≥7 weeks) pain, but were more likely to be better by the 4/5thvisit. Several variables at baseline were associated with improvement at the 4/5thvisit, but the predictive models were weak and unable to discriminate between patients who were improved and those who were not. In contrast, it was possible to elicit a predictive model for improvement later on at the 10thvisit, but only in patients with persistent pain. Being employed, reporting a decline in work fear-avoidance behaviour at the 4/5thvisit, and being better by the 4/5thvisit, were all independently associated with improvement. This model accounted for 34.3% (p < 0.001) of the variation in observed improvement, and had good discriminative ability (the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.80 (95%CI 0.73 to 0.86)) and approximate balance in correctly identifying improved and non-improved cases (79.0% and 68% respectively).Conclusions: We were unable to identify baseline characteristics that predicted early outcome in musculoskeletal pain patients. However, early self-reported improvement and decline in work fear-avoidance behaviour as predictors of later improvement highlighted the importance of speedy recovery in persistent musculoskeletal pain consulters. Our findings reinforce the elusive nature of baseline predictors, and the need for more emphasis on early changes as prognostic predictors in musculoskeletal conditions. © 2011 Bolton and Hurst; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Prognosis and prognostic research: What, why, and how?

984Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Outcome of low back pain in general practice: A prospective study

572Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessing the clinical significance of change scores recorded on subjective outcome measures

502Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Relationship between STarT Back Screening Tool and prognosis for low back pain patients receiving spinal manipulative therapy

55Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Using the STarT Back Tool: Does timing of stratification matter?

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Factors influencing final outcomes in patients with shoulder pain: A retrospective review

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bolton, J. E., & Hurst, H. C. (2011). Prognostic factors for short-term improvement in acute and persistent musculoskeletal pain consulters in primary care. Chiropractic and Manual Therapies, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-709X-19-27

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

56%

Researcher 8

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 20

49%

Nursing and Health Professions 10

24%

Psychology 7

17%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free