Discourse Analysis as Social Critique

  • Herzog B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Th is book aims to bridge the gap between normative theories and empiri- cal research. In social science and humanities, we can distinguish roughly three posi- tions towards normativity. Especially in social and political philosophy, we are quite accustomed to scholars who adopt a clear, normative stance, off ering compelling arguments for or against certain social and politi- cal institutions and ethical behaviour. Th e main problem is that we can fi nd several, even contradictory, reasonable positions. Although the debate between these positions can lead to common views, it does not necessarily do so, and often, there remain reasonable but opposing viewpoints. Th is may lead to the suspicion that, ultimately, the scholars engaged in these debates are not following universal norms but a particular worldview.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Herzog, B. (2016). Discourse Analysis as Social Critique. Discourse Analysis as Social Critique. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56908-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free