Cross-National Comparison of Open Access Models: A Cost/Benefit Analysis

2Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A large portion of research is financed with public funds, and now, with the arrival of digitalization, we are transitioning from the traditional model of scientific publication to Open Access. However, not all countries are dealing with this change in the same way. On one hand there are Platinum Open Access journals and on the other hand there is the APC (article processing charge) publication model, and both models can coexist in the same country. In terms of impact, we found that papers published in Open Access journals achieve a scientific impact that is above average; in contrast, the Non-Open Access papers remain below average. Within Open Access, Green and Hybrid modes stand out above in scientific impact, and Platinum and Gold below. In terms of cost, Platinum Open Access journals are free for the author. Depending on the percentage of publications that are routed to the different Open Access modalities, there are different country models, with different costs and different results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moya-Anegón, F., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Herrán-Páez, E. (2020). Cross-National Comparison of Open Access Models: A Cost/Benefit Analysis. In Evaluative Informetrics: The Art of Metrics-Based Research Assessment: Festschrift in Honour of Henk F. Moed (pp. 309–325). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47665-6_14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free