Reliability of COVID-19 symptom checkers as national triage tools: An international case comparison study

5Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives Triage is a critical component of the pandemic response. It affects morbidity, mortality and how effectively the available healthcare resources are used. In a number of nations the pandemic has sponsored the adoption of novel, online, patient-led triage systems-often referred to as COVID-19 symptom checkers. The current safety and reliability of these new automated triage systems remain unknown. Methods We tested six symptom checkers currently in use as triage tools at a national level against 52 cases simulating COVID-19 of various severities to determine if the symptom checkers appropriately triage time-critical cases onward to healthcare contact. We further analysed and compared each symptom checker to determine the discretionary aspects of triage decision-making that govern the automated advice generated. Results Of the 52 clinical presentations, the absolute rate of onward referral to any form of healthcare contact was: Singapore 100%, the USA 67%, Wales 65%, England 62%, Scotland 54% and Northern Ireland 46%. Triage decisions were broadly based on either estimates of 'risk' or 'disease severity'. Risk-based symptom checkers were more reliable, with severity-based symptom checkers often triaging time-critical cases to stay home without clinical contact or follow-up. Conclusion The COVID-19 symptom checkers analysed here were unable to reliably discriminate between mild and severe COVID-19. Risk-based symptom checkers may hold some promise of contributing to pandemic case management, while severity-based symptom checkers-the CDC and NHS 111 versions-confer too much risk to both public and healthcare services to be deemed a viable option for COVID-19 triage.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mansab, F., Bhatti, S., & Goyal, D. (2021). Reliability of COVID-19 symptom checkers as national triage tools: An international case comparison study. BMJ Health and Care Informatics, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100448

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free