Incidence and risk factors for bloodstream infections stemming from temporary hemodialysis catheters

12Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI) is considered as an important complication of hemodialysis catheters. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of temporary hemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infection. Materials and methods: Prospective data related to temporary hemodialysis catheters inserted in our institution were collected for duration of three years. The risk factors of CR-BSI of patients between the CR-BSI group and the control group were compared. Results: A total of 248 temporary hemodialysis catheters were inserted in 201 patients and remained in situ for a cumulative total of 5192 catheter days. There were 3254 dialysis sessions. CR-BSI was found in 63 cases. CR-BSI rate was 12.1/1000 catheter-days and 19.4/1000 dialysis sessions. In multivariate analysis, acute renal disease (OR = 2.29), administration of antibiotics at the time of catheterization (OR = 2.09), insertion in the femoral vein (OR = 2.14), emergency situation for catheter insertion (OR = 2.41), high number of catheter manipulation (OR = 2.49), and inadequate hand hygiene prior to catheter manipulations (OR = 3.02) were found to be risk factors of CR-BSI. The most frequently isolated microorganisms were coagulase-negative staphylococci (31.3%), S. aureus (26.9%), Enterococcus spp. (10.4%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9.0%). Conclusion: This prospective study of temporary hemodialysis catheters has shown high rates of infectious complications. The education of both the patients and medical staff in prevention of CR-BSI is important. © TÜBİTAK.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Çaylan, R., Yilmaz, G., Sözen, E. E., Aydin, K., & Köksal, I. (2010). Incidence and risk factors for bloodstream infections stemming from temporary hemodialysis catheters. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 40(6), 835–841. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-0908-236

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free