Impedance ratio method for urine conductivity-invariant estimation of bladder volume

21Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Non-invasive estimation of bladder volume could help patients with impaired bladder volume sensation to determine the right moment for catheterisation. Continuous, non-invasive impedance measurement is a promising technology in this scenario, although influences of body posture and unknown urine conductivity limit wide clinical use today. We studied impedance changes related to bladder volume by simulation, in-vitro and in-vivo measurements with pigs. In this work, we present a method to reduce the influence of urine conductivity to cystovolumetry and bring bioimpedance cystovolumetry closer to a clinical application.

References Powered by Scopus

Uses and abuses of EIDORS: An extensible software base for EIT

714Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bioimpedance and Bioelectricity Basics

524Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Behavioral therapy with or without biofeedback and pelvic floor electrical stimulation for persistent postprostatectomy incontinence: A randomized controlled trial

143Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Supervised learning classifiers for electrical impedance-based bladder state detection

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A comprehensive survey on non-invasive wearable bladder volume monitoring systems

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Image-based classification of bladder state using electrical impedance tomography

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schlebusch, T., Orschulik, J., Malmivuo, J., Leonhardt, S., Leonhäuser, D., Grosse, J., … Walter, M. (2014). Impedance ratio method for urine conductivity-invariant estimation of bladder volume. Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance, 5(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.5617/jeb.895

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

71%

Researcher 3

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 18

78%

Computer Science 2

9%

Materials Science 2

9%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0