Pseudomonas aeruginosa outer membrane protein F produced in Escherichia coli retains vaccine efficacy

20Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa outer membrane protein F was purified by extraction from polyacrylamide gels of cell envelope proteins of an Escherichia coli strain expressing the cloned gene for protein F. Antisera directed against protein F purified from P. aeruginosa PAO1 reacted with this E. coli strain by immunofluorescence assay and immunoblotting, whereas these antisera were nonreactive with E. coli strains lacking the Pseudomonas protein F gene. The protein F purified from this E. coli strain was used to immunize mice by intramuscular injection of 10 μg of protein F preparation on days 1 and 14, followed by burn and challenge of the mice on day 28. As compared with control mice immunized with E. coli K-12 lipopolysaccharide, immunization with the E. coli-derived protein F afforded significant protection against subsequent challenge with heterologous Fisher-Devlin immunotype 5 and 6 strains of P. aeruginosa. Antisera from mice immunized with the E. coli-derived protein F reacted at bands corresponding to protein F and 2-mercaptoethanol-modified protein F upon immunoblotting against cell envelope proteins of the PAO1, immunotype 5, and immunotype 6 strains of P. aeruginosa and the E. coli strain containing the cloned F gene, but failed to react at these sites in an E. coli strain lacking the F gene. These data demonstrate that P. aeruginosa protein F produced in E. coli through genetic engineering techniques retains its vaccine efficacy in the complete absence of any P. aeruginosa lipopolysaccharide. © 1990 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matthews-Greer, J. M., Robertson, D. E., Gilleland, L. B., & Gilleland, H. E. (1990). Pseudomonas aeruginosa outer membrane protein F produced in Escherichia coli retains vaccine efficacy. Current Microbiology, 20(3), 171–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02091993

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free