Newton's Third Rule and the Experimental Argument for Universal Gravity

0Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This book provides a reading of Newton's argument for universal gravity that is focused on the evidence-based, "experimental" reason-ing that Newton associates with his program of experimental philoso-phy. It highlights the richness and complexity of the Principia and also draws important lessons about how to situate Newton in his natural philosophical context. The book has two primary objectives. First, it defends a novel inter-pretation of the third of Newton's four Rules for the Study of Natural Philosophy - what the author terms the Two-Set Reading of Rule 3. Second, it argues that this novel interpretation of Rule 3 sheds ad-ditional light on the differences between Newton's experimental phi-losophy and Descartes's "hypothetical philosophy," and that it also illuminates how the practice of experimental philosophy allowed Newton to make a universal force of gravity the centerpiece of his explanation of the system of the world. Newton's Third Rule and the Experimental Argument for Universal Gravity will be of interest to researchers and advanced students work-ing on Newton's natural philosophy, early modern philosophy, and the history of science.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Domski, M. (2021). Newton’s Third Rule and the Experimental Argument for Universal Gravity. Newton’s Third Rule and the Experimental Argument for Universal Gravity (pp. 1–103). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003184256

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free