Similarity or difference? The relation between structure and strategy isomorphism in public organizations

14Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

While the organizational structures and strategies of public organizations have attracted substantial research attention among public management scholars, little research has explored how these organizational core dimensions are interconnected and influenced by pressures for similarity. In this paper I address this topic by exploring the relation between expenditure strategy isomorphism and structure isomorphism in Danish municipalities. Different literatures suggest that organizations exist in concurrent pressures for being similar to and different from other organizations in their field of action. It is theorized that to meet this challenge organizations may substitute increased similarity on one core dimension for increased idiosyncrasy on another, but only after a certain level of isomorphism is reached. Results of quantitative analyses support this theory and show that an inverse U-shaped relation exists between expenditure strategy isomorphism and structure isomorphism in a longitudinal quantitative study of Danish municipalities. © 2013 British Academy of Management.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Villadsen, A. R. (2013). Similarity or difference? The relation between structure and strategy isomorphism in public organizations. British Journal of Management, 24(S3). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12029

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free