Educational affordances of music video games and gaming mobile apps

1Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The rapid advancement of mobile and computing technologies has made the enjoyment of music in the video gaming experience more accessible and affordable, and has raised the interest of educators in the affordances of music-related games for informal music learning. This study aimed to examine the educational affordances of music-related games through content analysis. User reviews of music gaming mobile apps and video games were collected from two major digital distribution platforms and analysed to identify patterns and meanings related to their educational affordances and learning design. The findings reflected a sense of competence, autonomy and engagement resulting from playing video games, which motivated players to become self-directed learners in the context of informal learning. Several bias and limitations were identified, suggesting that an overreliance on video games may lead to unbalanced musical growth and incomprehensive musicianship training.

References Powered by Scopus

The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach

2335Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues

1653Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction

1522Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Innovative Applications and Teaching Effectiveness Analysis of Interactive Mobile Technology in Music Education

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cheng, L. (2024). Educational affordances of music video games and gaming mobile apps. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 33(3), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2024.2319171

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

69%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

15%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Arts and Humanities 5

42%

Sports and Recreations 3

25%

Linguistics 2

17%

Psychology 2

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free