Interferences in quantitative immunochemical methods

63Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the immunoassays, an antibody used as a reagent, detects an analyte (antigen) of interest. Although the noncovalent bound between analyte and complementary antibody is speci%c, false-positive and false-negative interferences are possible. Some interferences are similar to those in chemical analyses and some are typical only for immunoassays. One should suspect interferences in following cases: upon receiving an unacceptable result, if there is non-linearity during dilution, if there is no agreement with other test results or clinical data, if di9erent immunoassays in determination of the same analyte provide signi%cantly di9erent results. This paper reviews some of the possible interferences: 1) cross-reactivity with endogenous and exogenous non antibody-structured substances; 2) cross-reactivity with endogenous and exogenous antibody-structure substances; 3) the hook e9ect; and 4) the matrix e9ect. By knowing and recognizing interferences in immunoassays, one can avoid possible undesired consequences: diagnostic errors, treatment and monitoring of its e?cacy, unnecessary additional laboratory testing, unnecessary therapy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dodig, S. (2009). Interferences in quantitative immunochemical methods. Biochemia Medica. Biochemia Medica, Editorial Office. https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2009.005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free