In this concluding chapter of the second part of the book, I compare the conclusions from the previous chapters on the European and American experiences with the controversial practice of historians serving as expert judicial witness. My aim is to counter the argument made by Wijffels that historians should limit their involvement to providing historical facts for lawyers instead of testifying in court.
CITATION STYLE
Delafontaine, R. (2015). A Reassessment of Wijffels’ Concept of Forensic History. In Studies in the History of Law and Justice (Vol. 4, pp. 107–116). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14292-0_8
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.