An overview of alternative rule evaluation criteria and their use in separate-and-conquer classifiers

1Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Separate-and-conquer classifiers strongly depend on the criteria used to choose which rules will be included in the classification model. When association rules are employed to build such classifiers (as in ART [3]), rule evaluation can be performed attending to different criteria (other than the traditional confidence measure used in association rule mining). In this paper, we analyze the desirable properties of such alternative criteria and their effect in building rule-based classifiers using a separate-and-conquer strategy. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Berzal, F., Cubero, J. C., Marin, N., & Polo, J. L. (2006). An overview of alternative rule evaluation criteria and their use in separate-and-conquer classifiers. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4203 LNAI, pp. 591–600). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/11875604_66

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free