Prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) has become an important issue in today’s cardiovascular field, together with various developments in secondary prevention of basic cardiac diseases. The importance of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is now widely accepted because it has exhibited significant improvement in patients’ prognoses in ischemic and non-ischemic cardiovascular diseases. However, there is an unignorable gap between the ICD indication in the guidelines and real-world high-risk patients for SCD, especially in the acute recovery phase of cardiac injury. Although various studies have demonstrated a clinical benefit of defibrillation devices, the studies of immediate ICD use in the acute recovery phase have failed to exhibit a benefit in patients from the point of the view of a decrease in total deaths. To bridge this gap, the wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) provides a safer observation period in the acute phase and eliminates inappropriate overuse of ICD in the subacute phase. Here, we discuss the usefulness of the WCD and current understanding of its indications based on various clinical data. In conclusion, WCD is a feasible bridge to therapy and/or safe observation for patients at high risk of SCD, especially in the acute recovery phase of cardiac diseases.
CITATION STYLE
Niwano, S., Sekiguchi, Y., Ishii, Y., Iwasaki, Y., Kato, R., Okamura, H., … Nitta, T. (2018). Clinical usefulness of wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) and current understanding of its clinical indication in Japan. Circulation Journal. Japanese Circulation Society. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-17-1336
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.