Uncovering social structures and informational prejudices to reduce inequity in delivery and uptake of new molecular technologies

4Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Advances in molecular technologies have the potential to help remedy health inequities through earlier detection and prevention; if, however, their delivery and uptake (and therefore any benefits associated with such testing) are not more carefully considered, there is a very real risk that existing inequities in access and use will be further exacerbated. We argue this risk relates to the way that information and knowledge about the technology is both acquired and shared, or not, between health practitioners and their patients. A healthcare system can be viewed as a complex social network comprising individuals with different worldviews, hierarchies, professional cultures and subcultures and personal beliefs, both for those giving and receiving care. When healthcare practitioners are not perceived as knowledge equals, they would experience informational prejudices, and the result is that knowledge dissemination across and between them would be impeded. The uptake and delivery of a new technology may be inequitable as a result. Patients would also experience informational prejudice when they are viewed as not being able to understand the information that is presented to them, and information may be withheld. Informational prejudices driven by social relations and structures have thus far been underexplored in considering (in)equitable implementation and uptake of new molecular technologies. Every healthcare interaction represents an opportunity for experiencing informational prejudice, and with it the risk of being inappropriately informed for undertaking (or offering) such screening or testing. Making knowledge acquisition and information dissemination, and experiences of informational prejudice, explicit through sociologically framed investigations would extend our understandings of (in)equity, and offer ways to affect network relationships and structures that support equity in delivery and uptake.

References Powered by Scopus

WHO European review of social determinants of health and the health divide

1052Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interprofessional teamwork: Professional cultures as barriers

951Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations

684Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A sociology of precision-in-practice: The affective and temporal complexities of everyday clinical care

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Understanding communication between patients and healthcare professionals regarding comprehensive biomarker testing in precision oncology: A scoping review

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

“Knowledge was clearly associated with education.” epistemic positioning in the context of informed choice: a scoping review and secondary qualitative analysis

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Filoche, S., Stone, P., Cram, F., Bacharach, S., Dowell, A., Sika-Paotonu, D., … Dew, K. (2020). Uncovering social structures and informational prejudices to reduce inequity in delivery and uptake of new molecular technologies. Journal of Medical Ethics, 46(11), 763–767. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-105734

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

73%

Researcher 2

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 5

38%

Social Sciences 5

38%

Psychology 2

15%

Materials Science 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free