Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour - Is a continuous infusion of benefit?

66Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A randomised, single-blind study was conducted among 52 gravida in active labour, to investigate two variants of patient-controlled epidural analgesia - bolus only versus bolus plus infusion. Patient-controlled analgesia variables, using an epidural solution of 0.125% bupivacaine plus fentanyl 3 mcg per ml, were a 4 ml incremental bolus with 15 minute lookout, plus or minus a 4 ml per hour infusion. Up to three additional staff-administered supplements of 0.5% bupivacaine 4 ml (20 mg) were allowed. There was no significant difference between groups with respect to pain relief supplementary boluses required, satisfaction, side-effects or details of patient-controlled epidural analgesia, with the exception of greater fentanyl usage in the bolus plus infusion group (P < 0.003). Both groups had high quality analgesia, low rates of bupivacaine usage and were highly satisfied. However, under the conditions of the study, the addition of a continuous background infusion to self-administration conferred no benefit.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Paech, M. J. (1992). Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour - Is a continuous infusion of benefit? Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 20(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x9202000103

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free