Why Self-Commitment Is Not Enough: On a Regulated Minimum Standard for Ecologically and Socially Responsible Financial Products and Services

4Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A broad variety of financial products and services is advertised as being ecologically and socially responsible. The market for these products and services, however, is characterized by a number of shortcomings. First, financial service providers largely make their own very general definitions of what is ecologically and socially responsible. Therefore, it is largely impossible to fully understand these products and services and to compare among them and with “traditional” products and services. Second, there is no level playing field for providers of responsible financial products and services, which hampers competition in the market. To tackle these problems, we suggest a regulated minimum standard for ecologically and socially responsible financial products and services which addresses clear and unambiguous criteria and how information about their fulfillment should be presented. This standard would allow consumers to understand and compare financial products and services, and it would provide a level playing field for intermediaries and strengthen competition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oehler, A., Horn, M., & Wendt, S. (2018). Why Self-Commitment Is Not Enough: On a Regulated Minimum Standard for Ecologically and Socially Responsible Financial Products and Services. In Palgrave Studies in Sustainable Business in Association with Future Earth (Vol. Part F1860, pp. 405–421). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66387-6_15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free