Revisiting the Children-of-Twins Design: Improving Existing Models for the Exploration of Intergenerational Associations

41Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Datasets comprising twins and their children can be a useful tool for understanding the nature of intergenerational associations between parent and offspring phenotypes. In the present article we explore structural equation models previously used to analyse Children-of-Twins data, highlighting some limitations and considerations. We then present new variants of these models, showing that extending the models to include multiple offspring per parent addresses several of the limitations discussed. Accompanying the updated models, we provide power calculations and demonstrate with application to simulated data. We then apply to intergenerational analyses of height and weight, using a sub-study of the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort (MoBa); the Intergenerational Transmission of Risk (IToR) project, wherein all kinships in the MoBa data have been identified (a children-of-twins-and-siblings study). Finally, we consider how to interpret the findings of these models and discuss future directions.

References Powered by Scopus

806Citations
731Readers
Get full text
669Citations
312Readers

This article is free to access.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McAdams, T. A., Hannigan, L. J., Eilertsen, E. M., Gjerde, L. C., Ystrom, E., & Rijsdijk, F. V. (2018). Revisiting the Children-of-Twins Design: Improving Existing Models for the Exploration of Intergenerational Associations. Behavior Genetics, 48(5), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-018-9912-4

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

65%

Researcher 8

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 15

60%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

16%

Social Sciences 3

12%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0