Mathematization, Not Measurement: A Critique of Stevens’ Scales of Measurement

  • Thomas M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Stevens redefined measurement as “the assignment of numerals to objects and events according to a rule.” Using this definition, he defined four scales of measurement (nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio) and set out criteria for the appropriate statistical tests to be used with each. Stevens’ paper has been influential in statistics for the social sciences, but it is not grounded in either science or mathematics and confuses measurement with labeling and mathematization. Mathematization using set theory obviates the need for Stevens’ ad hoc framework.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thomas, M. A. (2019). Mathematization, Not Measurement: A Critique of Stevens’ Scales of Measurement. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.2458/v10i2.23785

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free