Understanding self-organization and formal institutions in peri-urban transformations: A case study from Beijing

8Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article explores the mechanisms of urban self-organization and the role of formal institutions in shaping peri-urban areas. A case study of Gaobeidian, a former rural village that is now part of Beijing, examines the mechanisms of change and the interdependent relations between institutions and bottom-up initiatives that drive peri-urban transformations. The paper presents two main contributions: (1) it identifies the differences between government-controlled planning, shared governance, self-governance and self-organization and how these intertwine in urban transformations; (2) it proposes three distinct roles played by institutions in relation to self-organization: triggering, constraining and enabling. The empirical study of this Chinese case will enrich the current debate on planning for self-organizing cities by revealing the impact of, and the various responses to, self-organization dynamics in a hierarchical institutional environment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, S., de Roo, G., & Rauws, W. (2020). Understanding self-organization and formal institutions in peri-urban transformations: A case study from Beijing. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 47(2), 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319888223

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free