Career identities and Millennials’ response to the graduate transition to work: lessons learned

13Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article answers the call for more research on Millennials’ experience of the graduate transition to work (GTW). Using an identity perspective, it investigates how Millennials explored and developed their career identities after the GTW, with a particular focus on traits often associated with younger generations such as boundaryless, protean and intrinsic motivations. Interviews were conducted with 36 Millennial graduates from U.k. and Irish universities. Findings confirmed that graduates largely avoided identity exploration until the GTW, with the latter perceived as a boundary experience and self-learning event. Four main themes of identity work developed from the data analysis: restraining the ideal self; reasserting the ideal self; revising the ideal self; and re-exploring possible selves. Participants appeared to increase their adaptability, self-drive and intrinsic motivation after the GTW in a way different from previous generations. Moreover, they continued to develop and change their career-identities long after the first few transitional years. Implications for Higher Education and organisational practice are accordingly discussed.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text

Possible Selves

5040Citations
894Readers
Get full text

Development and validation of ego-identity status

3234Citations
2025Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

3Citations
8Readers

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boyle, K. A. (2022). Career identities and Millennials’ response to the graduate transition to work: lessons learned. Journal of Education and Work, 35(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2021.2009782

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

54%

Lecturer / Post doc 8

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

8%

Researcher 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 9

41%

Social Sciences 6

27%

Psychology 5

23%

Arts and Humanities 2

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0