Medical research funding may have over-expanded and be due for collapse

26Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The continual and uninterrupted expansion of medical research funding is generally assumed to be a permanent feature of modern societies, but this expectation may turn out to be mistaken. Sciences tend to go through boom and bust phases. Twentieth century physics is an example where huge increases in funding followed an era of scientific breakthroughs. Speculative over-expansion led to diminishing returns on investment, then a collapse in funding. We predict that medicine will follow the same trajectory. After prolonged over-funding of the 'basic-to-applied' model of clinical innovation, and a progressive shift towards Big Science organization, medical research has become increasingly inefficient and ineffective. Although incremental improvements to existing treatment strategies continue, the rate of significant therapeutic breakthroughs has been declining for three decades. Medical science now requires rationalization and modernization. From this perspective, the current level of medical research funding looks like a bubble due to burst. © Association of Physicians 2005; all rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

The clinical investigator: bewitched, bothered, and bewildered--but still beloved.

266Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry

127Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Complex disease and the new clinical sciences

115Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Analysis of arterial intimal hyperplasia: Review and hypothesis

69Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Institutional operating figures in basic and applied sciences: Scientometric analysis of quantitative output benchmarking

66Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Contemporary (post-Wills) survey of the views of Australian medical researchers: Importance of funding, infrastructure and motivators for a research career

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Charlton, B. G., & Andras, P. (2005). Medical research funding may have over-expanded and be due for collapse. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 98(1), 53–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hci003

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

44%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

33%

Researcher 2

22%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

43%

Social Sciences 2

29%

Computer Science 1

14%

Neuroscience 1

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 6

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free