Evidence for task-specific resolution of response conflict

99Citations
Citations of this article
83Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

When a target requires different responses to a relevant and to an irrelevant task in a task-switching paradigm, there is response conflict This target-induced response conflict was combined with conflict caused by a subliminally presented prime presented prior to the target We found that target-related conflict reduced prime-induced conflict effects within the same trial. However, target-related conflict modified prime-related conflict effects according to the irrelevant stimulus-response (S-R) rule, but not according to the relevant S-R rule. Moreover, trial-to-trial modulations of the target congruency effect were observed in task repetition trials, but not in task switch trials. These results indicate that conflict resolution mechanisms, at least under the present circumstances, operate in a strictly task-specific manner. Copyright 2006 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

References Powered by Scopus

Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions

14221Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Conflict monitoring and cognitive control

5758Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task

5705Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Control and interference in task switching-a review

1236Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking-an integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research

431Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain

369Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., & Hoffmann, J. (2006). Evidence for task-specific resolution of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. Psychonomic Society Inc. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194000

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 38

53%

Researcher 18

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 14

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 55

81%

Neuroscience 8

12%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

4%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free