Whiteness and narratives of a racialized Canada-US border at Niagara

19Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper analyses accounts of a racialized Canada/US border gathered from young white Canadian border residents. I argue that these accounts clearly support scholarly and activist reports of the "racial profiling" of nonwhites. While some white interviewees criticized the border practices that they described, some also suggested that nonwhites were appropriately targeted for greater surveillance as part of a binational security project. Meanwhile there was little acknowledgement of the significant benefits of whiteness in the racialized border context. While these white narratives contradict official denials of "racial profiling," I suggest that they ultimately offer limited challenge to racially differentiated border im/mobilities that reproduce racial inequality. © Canadian Journal of Sociology.

References Powered by Scopus

The new mobilities paradigm

4326Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

"What group?" studying whites and whiteness in the era of "color-blindness"

428Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Human blacklisting: The global apartheid of the EU's external border regime

321Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Surfing the third wave of whiteness studies: reflections on Twine and Gallagher

42Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Crossing borders and managing racialized identities: Experiences of security and surveillance among young Canadian Muslims

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

From smart borders to perimeter security: The expansion of digital surveillance at the canadian borders

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Helleiner, J. (2012). Whiteness and narratives of a racialized Canada-US border at Niagara. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 37(2), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjs10016

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

80%

Researcher 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 6

75%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

13%

Psychology 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free