Course of depressive symptoms and treatment in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery (LABS-2) study

157Citations
Citations of this article
169Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective To examine changes in depressive symptoms and treatment in the first 3 years following bariatric surgery. Methods The longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery-2 (LABS-2) is an observational cohort study of adults (n = 2,458) who underwent a bariatric surgical procedure at 1 of 10 US hospitals between 2006 and 2009. This study includes 2,148 participants who completed the Beck depression inventory (BDI) at baseline and ≥ one follow-up visit in years 1-3. Results At baseline, 40.4% self-reported treatment for depression. At least mild depressive symptoms (BDI score ≥ 10) were reported by 28.3%; moderate (BDI score 19-29) and severe (BDI score ≥30) symptoms were uncommon (4.2 and 0.5%, respectively). Mild-to-severe depressive symptoms independently increased the odds (OR = 1.75; P = 0.03) of a major adverse event within 30 days of surgery. Compared with baseline, symptom severity was significantly lower at all follow-up time points (e.g., mild-to-severe symptomatology was 8.9%, 6 months; 8.4%, 1year; 12.2%, 2 years; 15.6%, 3 years; ps < 0.001), but increased between 1 and 3 years postoperatively (P < 0.01). Change in depressive symptoms was significantly related to change in body mass index (r = 0.42; P < 0001). Conclusion Bariatric surgery has a positive impact on depressive features. However, data suggest some deterioration in improvement after the first postoperative year. LABS-2, #NCT00465829, http://www. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00465829. Copyright © 2014 The Obesity Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mitchell, J. E., King, W. C., Chen, J. Y., Devlin, M. J., Flum, D., Garcia, L., … Yanovski, S. (2014). Course of depressive symptoms and treatment in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery (LABS-2) study. Obesity, 22(8), 1799–1806. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20738

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free