Phase I study of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, and everolimus in advanced solid tumors

4Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To define maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, and pharmacodynamics of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, and everolimus in advanced solid tumor patients. Design: This was a standard "3 + 3" dose-escalation trial. All subjects received bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg on day 1 of each cycle. Doses for capecitabine, oxaliplatin and everolimus were modified per dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Baseline and on-treatment plasma biomarkers were analyzed. Archived tumor mRNA levels were evaluated for NRP1, NRP2 and VEGF-A isoforms. Results: Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for toxicity and 30 for efficacy. Two DLTs were observed in cohort 1 and one DLT each was observed in cohort -1 and -1b. Grade ≥3 toxicities included neutropenia, hypertension, perforation/fistula/hemorrhage, hypertriglyceridemia, diarrhea, and thromboembolism. Twelve subjects experienced partial response (PR); 12 had stable disease as best response. Three of seven chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) subjects experienced PR; 8 of 15 chemonaive mCRC subjects experienced PR. Plasma TβRIII and IL-6 increased on treatment but without correlation to outcome. Increased VEGF165 levels significantly correlated with longer progression free survival. Conclusions: Everolimus with full dose capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab had unacceptable toxicity. MTD was: everolimus 5 mg daily; capecitabine 680 mg/m2 BID days 1-14; oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 and bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg, day 1. Activity was noted in mCRC. © 2014 Springer Science+Business Media.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rangwala, F., Bendell, J. C., Kozloff, M. F., Arrowood, C. C., Dellinger, A., Meadows, J., … Hurwitz, H. I. (2014). Phase I study of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, and everolimus in advanced solid tumors. Investigational New Drugs, 32(4), 700–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-014-0089-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free