Quantitative 7T phase imaging in premanifest huntington disease

13Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In vivo MR imaging and postmortem neuropathologic studies have demonstrated elevated iron concentration and atrophy within the striatum of patients with Huntington disease, implicating neuronal loss and iron accumulation in the pathogenesis of this neurodegenerative disorder. We used 7T MR imaging to determine whether quantitative phase, a measurement that reflects both iron content and tissue microstructure, is altered in subjects with premanifest Huntington disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Local field shift, calculated from 7T MR phase images, was quantified in 13 subjects with premanifest Huntington disease and 13 age- and sex-matched controls. All participants underwent 3T and 7T MR imaging, including volumetric T1 and 7T gradient recalled-echo sequences. Local field shift maps were created from 7T phase data and registered to caudate ROIs automatically parcellated from the 3T T1 images. Huntington disease-specific disease burden and neurocognitive and motor evaluations were also performed and compared with local field shift. RESULTS: Subjects with premanifest Huntington disease had smaller caudate volume and higher local field shift than controls. A significant correlation between these measurements was not detected, and prediction accuracy for disease state improved with inclusion of both variables. A positive correlation between local field shift and genetic disease burden was also found, and there was a trend toward significant correlations between local field shift and neurocognitive tests of working memory and executive function. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with premanifest Huntington disease exhibit differences in 7T MR imaging phase within the caudate nuclei that correlate with genetic disease burden and trend with neurocognitive assessments. Ultra-high-field MR imaging of quantitative phase may be a useful approach for monitoring neurodegeneration in premanifest Huntington disease.

Figures

  • FIG 1. A, ROIs are extracted automatically from 3T T1-weighted images by using FSL; the segmented caudate nuclei from 1 subject are shown in light blue. B, Caudate ROIs are automatically coregisteredwith the 7T data andoverlaid onto the phase images.C, PLIC ROIs drawnmanually (thin region drawnon each side of the brain inwhite) on 7T phase images.Mean PLIC phasewas used for normalization in the construction of LFSmaps in each patient.
  • FIG 2. Magnified phase image centered on the basal ganglia in a representative subject with pmHD. The numeric values of phase reflect the composite effects of iron concentration, deoxyhemoglobin within veins, myelin, and tissue microstructure.
  • FIG 3. Boxplots comparing caudate volume (left), normalized by the total intracranial volume (cubic millimeter/cubic millimeter); and LFS (right), normalized by mean PLIC phase (in parts per billion), in subjects with pmHD and controls. Caudate LFS and normalized volume are depicted for the interhemispheric average value (dark gray), the right caudate nucleus (intermediate gray), and the left caudate nucleus (light gray).
  • FIG 4. Scatterplots comparing caudate LFS with normalized caudate volume (left) and with CAPS (right) for subjectswithpmHDandcontrols. In the leftplot, triangles andcircles refer to subjectswith pmHD and controls, respectively. There was no correlation between caudate LFS and caudate volume. In the right plot, subjects in the low (x), medium ( ), and high ( ) CAPS groups. There is a strong positive correlation between CAPS and caudate LFS (R 2 0.61, P .003).
  • FIG 5. Scatterplots illustrating relationships between LFS and EXAMINER indices, including Executive Composite (top left), Fluency Factor (top right), Cognitive Control Factor (bottom left), and Working Memory Factor (bottom right). After correction for multiple comparisons, correlations were not significant but confirmed trends for Executive Composite (R2 0.32, P .031) and Working Memory Factor (R2 0.35, P .018). Circles (E) and triangles (Œ) refer to controls and subjects with pmHD, respectively.

References Powered by Scopus

Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images

9189Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Bayesian model of shape and appearance for subcortical brain segmentation

1866Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Huntington disease

1311Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Quantitative susceptibility mapping suggests altered brain iron in premanifest Huntington disease

113Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Role of iron in neurodegenerative diseases

99Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Neuroimaging in Dementia

70Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Apple, A. C., Possin, K. L., Satris, G., Johnson, E., Lupo, J. M., Jakary, A., … Hess, C. P. (2014). Quantitative 7T phase imaging in premanifest huntington disease. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 35(9), 1707–1713. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3932

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 23

53%

Researcher 18

42%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

2%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 17

45%

Neuroscience 12

32%

Psychology 5

13%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free