Logic and Intuition in Mathematics and Mathematical Education

  • Moer A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A good mathematics teacher is not only a good mathematician, but also a good teacher. In other words, a good mathematics teacher is not only able to solve mathematical problems, (s)he is also able to explain how mathematical problems are solved. Many mathematicans (and mathematics teachers) are, however, able to solve mathematical problems without knowing or understanding how they solve these problems: solving a mathematical problem often involves a multitude of unconscious or intuitive mental processes. And a person who solves certain problems without knowing or understanding how (s)he solves these problems is not able to explain to others how these problems can be solved. Consequently, many mathematics teachers would be better teachers if they knew more about the psychology of mathematicians and mathematical invention. In this article, the distinction between mathematical invention and mathematical discovery will be discussed from a psychological viewpoint. Some ideas about the psychology of mathematicians and mathematical invention will be formulated. These ideas fit in with so-called universal Darwinism and will be helpful in understanding the distinction between mathematical intuition on the one hand, and deduction or logic on the other.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moer, A. V. (2007). Logic and Intuition in Mathematics and Mathematical Education. In Philosophical Dimensions in Mathematics Education (pp. 159–179). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71575-9_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free