The Effectiveness of POGIL on High School Student Chemistry End-of-Course Examinations

0Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this quantitative, causal-comparative research study was to determine if and to what extent there were differences in chemistry end-of-course (EOC) examination scores between high school chemistry students taught using POGIL pedagogy and non-POGIL pedagogy in the state of Utah. Piaget's cognitive development theory and Johnstone's cognitive load theory served as the theoretical foundations. A large, public school district in the state of Utah provided the deidentified, archival data for this study, which consisted of students that took a chemistry course and chemistry EOC examination in 2015-2016 or 2016-2017. The research question sought to find whether there was a statistically significant difference in chemistry EOC examination scores for high school students in both groups. A one-way ANOVA demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the POGIL and non-POGIL student groups on the dependent variable of chemistry EOC examination scores, F(1, 314) = 29.91, p < 0.001, partial η2= 0.087, (p < 0.05). This study supported POGIL pedagogy as an effective instructional strategy for improving student chemistry EOC examination scores.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mata, L. E. (2022). The Effectiveness of POGIL on High School Student Chemistry End-of-Course Examinations. Science Education International, 33(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i2.5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free